
Open-mindedness key to discovering truth
To Talk of Many Things
by Jonathan Kelly
Every day through the media of print journalism
and broadcast news, there is a wide dissemination of opinion that
is meant to make us think about important, relevant topics. Subjects
ranging from the conflict in Iraq to prescription drug coverage
to trade policy attract numerous opinions to the op-ed pages and
the political exchange shows.
When many different thoughts on public affairs
are brought out into the open, it is beneficial for conversation
on these affairs to be undertaken.
Our political culture thrives on the exchange of
opinion concerning public affairs that affects our country and the
world. The political and institutional foundations of the American
republic are grounded in the free distribution of opinion.
Therefore, it is very important for people to engage
in substantive discussion about how best to shape public policy
to serve the general welfare. Many ideas in many different areas
deserve serious exploration. To do so, it is useful to examine the
art of conversation and how it should be utilized to achieve a civil
exploration of ideas. For beneficial discussion to flourish, it
is fundamental that people who engage in it be open-minded.
Open-mindedness is a necessary component for all
the participants in a productive discussion. This trait is needed
in order to carry out an underlying purpose of mutual discourse.
The word "conversation" has the same root as the term
"convert" that is, to change. This implies that,
in conversation, there is an expectation of change on the part of
all participants. Change is created by the degree of open-mindedness
exhibited by conversationalists.
A fundamental objective of a true conversation
is for the participants to arrive at an understanding of what each
other is thinking. A mutual understanding among the participants
about the ideas that each person is attempting to convey is necessary.
In this way, people taking part in the conversation
should walk away from the discussion with a new appreciation of
the ideas expressed by the other conversationalists. The change
that takes place in the conversationalists is the new comprehension
of whatever the other persons are trying to say.
In essence, true conversation requires change because
each person involved should be able to comprehend differing ideas
in a way he or she did not comprehend previously.
The key challenge is for all the participants to
be willing to listen to and consider the ideas being expressed,
even thosewith which they may disagree.
If, in a discussion, each person simply states
his own opinion in a dogmatic manner without taking the time to
consider the ideas of others, then the participants merely are engaging
in verbal theater, not good-faith conversation. It becomes impossible
for change to occur in peoples thoughts or feelings about
ideas if they close their minds and convince themselves that they
already know how the world works.
The participants in a conversation are not required
to change their ideas and opinions about topics, although certainly
this can happen. What should change is their appreciation of the
ideas expressed by their fellow conversationalists.
When people engage in a discussion and come away
with a new understanding of why others feel as they do on the matter
discussed, they have changed themselves in a positive way intellectually.
From an intellectual standpoint, people are reminded that there
are many aspects to ultimate truth, and that they and others may
possess some of those aspects in their ideas.
The fruit of this discourse is genuine contribution
to the service of democracy. America is founded on opinion, and
it is nourished by the injection of many different arguments into
the public forum. Only when ideas are exchhhanged open-mindedly
can all sides of a debate clearly be expressed and carefully considered,
and only then can we arrive closer to ultimate truth. John Stuart
Mill put it best, stating that "since the general or prevailing
opinion on any subject is rarely or never the whole truth, it is
only by the collision of adverse opinions that the remainder of
the truth has any chance of being supplied."
The process of sorting through ideas is enhanced
when everyone approaches serious discourse with a real willingness
to listen. Once we adopt that mentality, we are one step closer
to discovering the truth.
Jonathan Kelly is a junior political science
major.
|