![]() |
||||||||||
|
Thursday, January 27, 2005
Letters to the editorDuke Dog support appreciated We would like to thank you for your overwhelming support of Duke Dog
during his campaign for Mascot of the Year. You made him the most popular
mascot, and for that we congratulate you. Unfortunately, we did not win the overall competition. The mascot competition
is a two-part process: online voting and entry judging. We won the online
vote and were named "Most Popular Mascot" by Capital One, but
we had no involvement in the judging portion of the process. We do not
know the results of the judging portion of the contest so that the online
voting is not influenced. We were well aware of the process for determining the winner of the contest
before we entered, and signed an agreement before entering to that end.
Like you, we are disappointed that we did not win, but we would hope that
you as fans and wonderful representatives of JMU would take great pride
in the fact that the portion you could influence was won by your constant
and overwhelming support. We will be working hard this year to develop
a great presentation to make the team again next year, and to try again
to make Duke Dog the Mascot of the Year. We look for your positive support during this process, and your overwhelming
support again if we make the team next year. Thank you for your support,
and for making Duke Dog the most popular mascot in the nation. You should
be very proud. Brad Edmondson Police, JMU should provide crime facts The article titled "Winter break-ins preventable" in the Jan.
24 edition reiterates the obvious by telling students to lock their doors
and windows if they dont want to be robbed. It is nice for us to
all be reminded of that fact, but shouldnt we all also be able to
take a proactive role in catching this person? A robbery took place last week in my own apartment building and I was
notified of this by a passerby not by the police to warn me or
to ask me questions about seeing anything suspicious. I know another person
who was robbed in another complex who gave the police a clear description
of the assailant which matched many of the other victims descriptions.
Why arent we informed of this description so that we can be more
aware and help in the search? I think the police and the JMU community should be doing a much better
job of getting the information out there. Give us descriptions, sketches,
times and places; ask us questions, we might have the answer. Meredith West Demonstration poorly supported On Friday, the face of anti-abortion took the form of four males, all
dressed as the Grim Reaper, standing silently on the commons holding massive
signs that contained undocumented anti-abortion statistics. Students have the right to know where the statistics came from. When
I asked one man where he got his statistics, he refused to reply. I asked them, "Do you know anyone who has ever been faced with the
decision of whether to have an abortion?" "How has having an
abortion affected your life?" No replies. Apparently being male and
contemplating an abortion had left them speechless. This brings me to my second reason to oppose the protest. Was the protest
tasteful, successful or appropriate in representing the belief of anti-abortionists?
The answer was an overwhelming "no" by anti-abortion males and
females alike. Although their use of visual rhetoric was alarming, the
protest did little for the anti-abortion cause. Their choice to remain anonymous and refusal to answer questions consequently
failed to persuade me that abortion is about anything other than choice.
Being pro-choice is not about the morality of abortion or neglecting life,
but rather having faith that women will make responsible decisions. It
is about respecting a womans right to life and choice. As my grandmother
once said, if God had given men a uterus, abortions would never have been
challenged. If the Grim Reaper is the face of pro-life, then a compassionate
Lady Liberty is the face of pro-choice. Kate Griendling
|
|
||||||||