![]() |
|||||||||||
| Thursday, October 14, 2004
SGA supports no-weapons policyBill of opinion passes by narrow marginby Kelly Jasper / senior writer
The Student Senate narrowly passed a bill of opinion Tuesday, supporting
the right of the university to enforce a no-weapons policy. For more than an hour, senators debated the bill, introduced last week
by freshman Sara Lunsford. The senator drafted the bill after Keezletown
resident David Briggman filed a lawsuit challenging campus policy, which
doesnt make an exception for those who hold concealed-handgun permits. "This is a bill to protect student safety, to support the right
to have a weapons policy," Lunsford said. The non-binding bill doesnt
actually ban weapons from campus but serves as a representation of student
opinion. The bill was also passed by the executive council Wednesday morning. Lunsford plans to petition the Virginia General Assembly to change state
law, specifically allowing colleges and universities to ban guns. "JMU has the right to make a weapons policy," Lunsford said
during the debate. "A few people have said that having a policy like
this violates the Second Amendment. But the constitutional right to bear
arms is not unlimited by the Constitution." Briggman watched the debate from the back of the Senate until a senator
yielded him time to speak. "Im not asserting Second Amendment rights," he said.
"Im saying that the state of Virginia has granted me the privilege
not the right to carry a gun on campus." Regardless of the Senates decision, the lawsuit, scheduled for
Oct. 20 in Rockingham County Circuit Court, is proceeding. The bill passed by a narrow margin, with four more votes than the two-thirds
needed. The bill also required signatures from 10 percent of the student body.
The final count reached 2,701 students 7 percent more than Lunsford
needed. To accurately reflect the student body, Sen. Lucy Hutchinson said senators
should vote on student opinion. "Vote for your constituents," Hutchinson said. "This bill
gives the university more day-to -day control. Theyll tell you why
they signed and its because were more safe." Still, some senators questioned the validity of the signatures. "I think people felt pressured into signing even when they didnt
know what they were doing," said sophomore Sen. Ryan Powell, who
also was approached to sign the bill. "How many were given valid information of what this case is about?
People didnt sign for the right reasons," he said. Lunsford said she kept a copy of the bill with her while asking for signatures. "The legal issues aside," she said. "This is a bill to protect student safety and students support it." |
|
|||||||||