
Panel debates ECP
Students voice opinions on distribution
by Nathan Chiantella / staff writer

Amy Paterson / senior photographer
Senior Lenny Tengco opposed the ban of the emergency contraceptive pill from the University Health Center during a debate Oct. 15. Tengco called the ban a "symbolic slap across the face for the female population of JMU."
|
Voicing opinions for and against the distribution
of emergency contraceptive pills, about 110 students participated
in an open forum Oct. 15.
The debate and discussion was sponsored by the
University Health Center, debate team and Student Government Association.
An entrance poll of 76 students found that 49 students
supported having ECPs distributed on campus, seven were against
distribution and 20 were undecided, according to Public Debate Coordinator
Lisa Tawil. An exit poll found that out of 71 students, 48 supported
having ECPs on campus, 17 were against distribution and six were
undecided.
The debate, moderated by John Stone, an associate
professor of communication studies, was between two groups, consisting
of two students each. Seniors Elizabeth McCeney and Spencer
Daniel defended the Board of Visitor's decision. Seniors
Lenny Tengco and junior Amylee Ray were against the decision.
Pete Bsumek, an instructor of communication studies,
introduced the debate, and said it was important because it provided
"a space for [the] issues to be expressed in the right environment."
Bsumek also said that the debate hopefully would educate JMU students
on the "truly important" issue of the ECP and show some
of the "effects it has on campus life."
McCeney, who spoke first for the opposing side,
said the distribution of ECPs was "inappropriate and unacceptable"
for taxpayers to provide the funds to stock the Health Center and,
therefore, should have a voice in what medications are shelved. McCeney
also said that since Virginia is a conservative state with a conservative
governor, the ECPs go against conservative ideals, which frown upon
premartial sexual relations.
"It is irresponsible in the current economy
to provide this pill when whoever needs it can simply go to a pharmacy,"
McCeney said. After she said faculty and enrollment cutbacks
were evidence of the economy struggle that Virginia schools are
facing, McCeney said that a large part of ECP distribution is a
matter of what it costs the taxpayers as well as JMU.
Tengco then spoke for the opposing team, and said
the ban was "a symbolic slap across the face for the female
population of JMU."
Tengco also refuted the economic reasoning McCeney
presented. He said that the public does not pay for the drug
the student needing ECPs does. JMU pays $15 for a pill, and any
student receiving the drug pays $15 as well, according to Tengco.
Tengco went on to say that women at JMU are more
important than the budget, and it is "crucial" to provide
services, such as the distribution of ECPs, in case of a possible
pregnancy emergency.
Daniel refuted statements made by Tengco. He called
the decision to ban the pill "symbolic, for it represents the
ideals and values of the state." Daniel said that abortion
merely was "a matter of semantics," based upon differing
beliefs of when a fetus is a human being.
Daniel also said that, in cases of sexual assault,
a female still can get the ECP at CVS and, therefore, "no one's
rights are being infringed upon." He added that no student
is being denied the pill because there are many places to pick up
ECPs, and it is not JMU's place to provide them when "taxpayers
and Virginia society as a whole disagree."
Ray began her statements for the opposing team
and said the "ECP does not hinder morality, but not allowing
it to be distributed is a direct hindrance [of morality]."
Ray said making women go out into a community "which
is already hostile to JMU students" deprives them of privacy
in cases of sexual assault. She said a trip to a local pharmacy
"creates an intimidating environment, which the Health Center
does not."
Ray also said the pill is much more expensive at
local pharmacies than the price it was offered at the Health Center.
ECPs range in price from $25.95 to $30.99, according to the Health
Center's Web site, www.jmu.edu/healthctr/new/services/ecp.html.
To end the debate, Stone offered the microphone
to any student wishing to comment on the ECP debate, or ask questions
to those who were involved in the debate. About 25 or 30 students
spoke after the debate, according to Tawil, who said the discussion
continued for over 30 minutes.
|