
Grenada anniversary marks Cold War turn
To Talk of Many Things
by Jonathan Kelly
Last Saturday marked the 20th anniversary of a
highly significant event in the history of the Cold War the
U.S. invasion of the Caribbean island nation of Grenada and the
successful ouster of its brutal Marxist government. The dramatic
and decisive operation set back the advance of Soviet colonialism
in the Western Hemisphere, and helped shift the momentum of the
Cold War in the direction of the free world.
Marxist forces seized control of Grenada in 1979,
and the island quickly became a strategic focal point in the Cold
War. The Grenadian Marxists soon received support from the Soviet
Union and Cuba, becoming part of the worldwide communist bloc. It
was a dangerous development for the United States to be faced with
a new Soviet proxy nation in its own hemisphere.
On Oct. 13, 1983, the Marxist leader of Grenada,
Maurice Bishop, was overthrown by Bernard Coard, an even more radical
leftist. The coup was bloody and frightened neighboring Caribbean
states.
The violence also concerned the United States because
600 American medical students were on the island. Thus, President
Ronald Reagan dispatched American Marines and Rangers to Grenada
Oct. 25, 1983. After fierce fighting, the communist regime was overthrown,
the students were rescued, and Grenada soon was restored to its
democratic constitutional government.
Although the Grenada incursion was a single, brief
operation, it is important to realize the far-reaching impact it
had on the course of the Cold War. The elimination of an outlaw
regime allied with the cause of communist colonization
engendered a number of significant political side effects that would
prove auspicious to American interests.
The foremost achievement was the halting of Soviet-Cuban
expansion in the Caribbean and Latin America. Under Marxist rule,
Grenada was made to function as a heavily developed military base
for arming and supplying Soviet-sponsored fighters throughout Latin
America. If not for the timely intervention, the entire region could
have been in danger of falling to communist forces, leaving the
United States strategically out-maneuvered by the Soviet Union.
The diplomatic benefits cannot be overstated any
more than the strategic ones. Coard's deadly coup was a great
source of fear among U.S. allies in the region, leading a number
of Caribbean nations to appeal for help, lest they be targeted by
the Marxists.
If the United States had failed to act, its credibility
among these allies would have been damaged. However, having sundered
a vassal regime from the Soviet sphere of influence, the United
States was able to foster greater good will with its Caribbean allies.
This proved to be vital for future cooperation in carrying out Cold
War containment policy.
The operation provoked considerable criticism concerning
its prudence and justification. Editor Robert Kaiser opined in the
Oct. 30, 1983, issue of The Washington Post that the Reagan
administration's ideological approach to national security
had squandered American moral authority to objurgate Soviet tyranny.
The same issue featured columnist Mary McGrory musing that the administration
lacked sufficient reason to use military force.
The Grenada ouster, however, would have been justified
even if no American students were on the island because
the regime was complicit in overall Soviet attempts to undermine
U.S. security. It would not have been wise to ignore the prospect
of communist guerrillas and terrorists spreading so close to American
borders.
In The Washington Post's Nov. 2, 1983,
issue, columnist David Broder rightly pointed out that the invasion
potentially would send an important signal to Moscow that America
would not tolerate being threatened in a key region. In the same
issue, columnist William F. Buckley elaborated by pointing out that
the invasion was a logical extension of American policy to stop
communist imperialism.
The invasion of Grenada ultimately turned out to
be a contributing factor in building American confidence and rolling
back Soviet influence in the Western Hemisphere. The event also
proved to signal the eventual collapse of communism as a threat
to the world.
Jonathan Kelly is a junior political science
major.
|