Thursday, February 10, 2005

House bill dials right number
House Editorial
Samantha, age 21, is driving down Interstate 81, chatting on the cell
phone with her mom. Cruise control is set at the speed limit, 65 miles
per hour. All of her stickers are updated. Samantha only has one thing
against her she looks young.
Soon, Samantha sees a pair of red and blue flashing lights behind her.
She pulls over. When the officer approaches her window, she says to him,
"Officer, why have you pulled me over? I am not violating any laws."
The officer replies, "You look like youre 17 years old, and
its illegal for you to be that young and talk on the cell phone
while driving."
When Samantha hands over her drivers license and registration,
the officer realizes he made a big mistake. Samantha is 21.
While this scenario is just hypothetical, it could happen if the Virginia
House of Delegates goes along with two senators, James K. OBrien,
Jr., R-Fairfax and William C. Mims, R-Loudon, who just succeeded in passing
a bill in the state Senate that would bar drivers under the age of 18
from using cell phones while operating vehicles.
The bill itself is understandable, and it should be well supported. Young
drivers, who are also more than likely avid cell phone users, are more
susceptible to distractions because of fewer years of driving experience.
But heres the catch with OBrien and Mims the senators
are also trying to get this no-cell-phone-under-18 bill passed as a primary
rather than secondary offense. That means that police officer
can look in someones car, guess their age and pull them over. Officers
already do that if a driver looks under age 16 and is driving without
a parent, but something about the proposed law just doesnt seem
quite right.
It is unfair to give police officers the ability to judge the ages of
cell phone users, but we have a solution for them. Change the law to ban
all individuals, despite their ages, from using cell phones while driving.
Yes, we believe younger drivers are more dangerous on the road, but that
doesnt mean older drivers arent dangerous. Its important
that this law is made a primary offense. Officers no longer will have
to judge ages; they just have to see someone talking on a cell phone.
|