![]() |
||||||||||
| Thursday, February 24, 2005
Charter bill revised, passedColleen Schorn / Senior writer
A bill that would give Virginia universities more control over their
own operations and finances was passed in the Virginia Senate and House
of Delegates. The bill originally was regarding the idea of allowing charter schools
in Virginia, but it was revised to become the Higher Education Reform
Bill. The bill would offer graduated autonomy to universities with a three-tier
approach. All universities in Virginia would qualify for the first tier,
which would offer slightly more autonomy than offered now. Some universities, such as JMU, would qualify for the second tier. A
vote from the Board of Visitors would allow a university to enter the
second tier, and it would allow the school to operate certain areas without
state support. "The university has not yet formulated its position on the legislation,"
said Andy Perrine, university spokesman. "The bills were amended
so much as they went through the process that they bear almost no resemblance
to what was originally proposed. So we are still assessing what the legislation
means for Madison." The state can still have the final say, Culligan said. Universities in the third tier would have to enter a management agreement
with the governors office, and they would be given much more flexibility
than is available now. These schools could negotiate tuition, enrollment
and in-state/out-of-state ratios. No school has qualified for the third tier yet, Student Body President
Tom Culligan said. The idea for the bill began more than a year ago when the University
of Virginia, The College of William & Mary and Virginia Tech tried
for more autonomy. The third tier resembles the charter system that these
schools sought. The revised bill is similar to that introduced by the three schools,
but it will not allow universities to dictate tuition any more than they
can now. Culligan said SGA has been fighting for this revised bill since the issue
began. He said many people were looking for alternative proposals to the
chartered universities system. All university presidents were in support of and signed the new bill. Culligan said that the new bill is more beneficial to JMU for two reasons. First, universities would be allowed to keep the interest from the money
they invest, such as tuition. Second, each university would negotiate and sign a six-year contract of accountability with the governors office. The contract would set up specific goals that must be obtained by a certain time, and predict the tuition for each year. |
|
||||||||