![]() |
||||||||||
|
Monday, February 28, 2005
Letters to the editorHuman life always holds value Recently, I have been angered by legal developments in the case of a
disabled Florida woman, Terri Schiavo. I suggest a change in the way we,
as citizens of the United States, view human life. After suffering cardiac
arrest in 1990, Terri suffered brain damage. Since then, Terris
husband, Michael Schiavo, has sought to remove her feeding tube, which
would result in her death from starvation and dehydration. Her family
has said Terris eye contact and physical responses to loved ones
indicate she is by no means a vegetable. While her case is both a frightening
injustice to all people with disabilities and a pitfall of judicial activism,
it is primarily a humanitarian concern. Is this how we, as U. S. citizens,
view human life? Does any one person have the right to end Terris
life simply because she cannot visibly contribute to society? Thats
called utilitarianism. While many of us would never subscribe to such
an injustice, I suggest our words and actions tell a different story.
To my grief, I believe we do think this way on many issues abortion
among them. But we must consider the consequences of those ideas. We must
carefully examine our thinking to ensure we never allow someones
worth to be determined by his or her abilities or contributions. Who knows,
we may one day find ourselves in Terris shoes, helpless and hoping
that others see our intrinsic value. So, in your shoes, right now, where
do you find human worth? Stephanie Naus
|
|
||||||||