
Senate passes amendments for NAACP T-shirts, awards
by Toni Duncan / senior writer

Evin Shoap / contributing photographer
Members of the NAACP go over budget issues at the SGA meeting Tuesday night.
|
The longest debate during the Student Government Association's
front-end budgeting night surrounded amendments to the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People's budget.
Senior Katherine Ferguson, Finance Committee member, said the
committee cut $113 for 15 T-shirts for the NAACP's executive board,
removed some office supplies money and cut the organization's Brown
vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas scholarship.
"This is a new scholarship, and we didn't see how it met
any requirements for rewarding it," Ferguson said.
Senior Kristin Parker, president of JMU's NAACP chapter, said
the scholarship for $150 went to an organization in Harrisonburg
called the Young Achievers.
The SGA debated its first NAACP amendment, which was proposed
by junior Ricardo Pineres, Ashby Hall Senator, and would return
$113 to the group for the 15 T-shirts.
The T-shirts are used by the executive council to help promote
their organization, Pineres said. The T-shirts also are the same
reason why SGA gave the Black Student Alliance money to buy T-shirts
for its executive council to be more visible during the group's
events.
Senior Seong Kim, senior Class Council president, said the T-shirts
help create awareness for the group everywhere they are worn, and
they have a large impact even off campus.
SGA debated on which positions should be awarded the T-shirts
and if it was being consistent by giving T-shirts to the BSA Executive
Council and not to the NAACP. Some senators felt T-shirts only should
go to the nine executive members.
Junior Ana Adinolfi, College of Arts and Letters senator, proposed
an amendment to the amendment that would add $67.50 to the NAACP's
budget, which would give the organization's nine executive members
the standard SGA monetary allotment for T-shirt money at $7.50 each.
Junior Lauren Broussard, College of Integrated Science and Technology senator
and Diversity Committee head said she disagreed with this new change
in the amendment.
By looking at each group individually, she said, NAACP needs all
15 T-shirts because that is how the group is designed, with 15 people
that play large public roles when helping with events.
Parker said advisers "are extremely vital" to the organization,
and while there only may be nine executive members, the 15 people
who make up a larger board of leaders, include the advisers and
committee heads that need to be in charge at events.
The amendment that would change the original amendment from $113
to $67.50 did not pass.
The amendment to give NAACP back the $113 that originally was
cut by the Finance Committee for shirts was passed.
The next amendment brought to the floor was giving money back
to the NAACP Image Awards program, which recognizes students and
groups on campus. NAACP originally asked for $600 to purchase 27
awards for the event, but the Finance Committee cut the amount back
to $200 because it thought the group only would hand out eight awards,
Gray said.
However, Parker said there were 27 awards that will be awarded,
not eight as the Finance Committee originally had believed. With
27 awards, sophomore class president Wesli Spencer said NAACP should
be given an extra $1,150 to that budgeted item to cover the cost
of all the awards.
Junior Matt Gray, Finance Committee head, said NAACP completed
the Image Awards show last year with $600 and should do the same
this year.
"It's been a zero-increase year," Gray said. "The
$1,150 would be coming from contingency, the fund that SGA gives
non-FEB organizations money from, and "contingency affects
such a large number of organizations."
Ferguson agreed NAACP should not receive the additional $1,150.
"They did no budget research and they want to throw something
in and take [money] from contingency," she said.
Parker said NAACP was not able to get by last year on the funds
it was allotted. Instead, it made some of the awards certificates
instead of trophies or plaques.
Spencer said, "We shouldn't have any of the FEB organizations
just be getting by … they didn't know they could ask for the [extra]
money they needed."
Senators voted down the ammendment that would make the total $1,350
for the awards.
The senators then went back to the original amendment that would
give an additional $400 to NAACP, make it a total of $600 for the
Image Awards.
Gray said this was fair because the Finance Committee were going
by incorrect award numbers before and "[NAACP] can put on a
quality program for $600 — they did it last year."
Senior Adrianne Laputka, College of Arts and Letters senator,
said the actual award , whether it is a trophy or a certificate,
should not matter because it is the individuals' recognitions that
are important.
However, Spencer said this was not fair to the organization. "Six
hundred dollars is not what they need, they need more than that,"
he said. "These are all FEB groups, and [all the FEB groups]
deserve to be treated the same way [as each other]."
This amendment passed, which increased the money for the awards
from $200 as the Finance Committee's proposed to $600.
Spencer proposed the next amendment that would add $150 for the
Brown vs. Board of Education scholarship from the contingency.
Ferguson said this item was removed because there were "no
guidelines or requirements could be listed … [It was not] documented
on how it is going [to work] out."
Kim said this scholarship helps retain community relations and
is important to the organization.
When debate ended, the Senate voted against the bill and NAACP
did not get money for the scholarship. |