![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
Monday, August 30, 2004
Baraka’s hate unwelcome hereBreeze Reader’s Viewby Dan Teweles & Jacob Forstater
JMU has a long-standing tradition of promoting multiculturalism. As an
organization that represents minority students at JMU and actively works
with Center for Multicultural/International Student Services organizations
to promote multicultural understanding and tolerance, Hillel applauds
JMUs sponsorship of the Furious Flower II Poetry Conference. However, JMU has another crucial long-standing tradition: upholding the
highest standards of intellectual rigor and honesty in academic scholarship
and discussion. Inviting Amiri Baraka, who consistently has repeated racist,
misogynist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic rhetoric without provocation,
to speak at JMU, belies our proud tradition. For over 40 years, Baraka has used his rhetoric to promote anti-Semitic
and anti-Israel propaganda, racist fallacies and falsehoods, and homophobic
slandering and scare tactics. We are not alone in our concerns
Baraka was removed from his position of Poet Laureate of New Jersey by
the governor and legislature of the state in 2002. At the same time, we are not poetry critics, nor do we purport to be. Our concern is rooted in Mr. Barakas unquestionable and documented history of hateful rhetoric in his public appearances. Regarding whites role in the Civil Rights Movement, Baraka tells
this anecdote: "A woman asked me in all earnestness couldnt
any whites help? I said, You can help by dying. You are a
cancer. You can help the worlds people with your death."
Barakas contribution to poetry is substantial, but his contribution
does not excuse over 40 years of hate speech. JMU should not provide such
a forum for this man and his views. As members of the JMU community, we
have a duty to ensure that the values JMU represents are upheld. Baraka
has a right to express his opinions, no matter how outrageous and offensive
they may be. But as members of the JMU community, we are entrusted with
the duty to ensure that our university makes well-informed decisions.
He may speak, but he should not be invited to speak at JMU. We steadfastly
believe in Barakas first amendment rights, but there is a clear
difference between an open forum sponsored by JMU and his legal rights
to speak in public. Barakas history of hateful speech has no place at JMU. Hillel only
has strived to better inform our peers, administration and community,
as the best decision is always well-informed. Furthermore, let no mistake
be made, this is not a Jewish issue. This is a people issue an
issue that affects each one of us, no matter our background. Mr. Baraka
is an equal opportunity offender and fails to draw any hierarchical depth
when espousing fallacies and falsehoods. A university, especially a respected institution such as JMU, should
do everything in its power to promote understanding, unity and education,
and not to encourage hatred, misinformation and disharmony. It is said
that actions speak louder than words. If JMU provides Baraka with another
forum to espouse his hateful views, does that action reflect the principles
and values for which JMU is known and respected? Dan Teweles is a junior philosophy and religion and political science
major and president of Hillel. |
|
||||||||